1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Hi there Guest! You should join our Minecraft server @ meepcraft.com
  3. We also have a Discord server that you can join @ https://discord.gg/B4shfCZjYx
  4. Purchase a rank upgrade and get it instantly in-game! Cookies Minecraft Discord Upgrade

Best Posts in Thread: Should there be a war between North Korea and America?

  1. Fuzzlr

    Fuzzlr Owner Staff Member Owner

    Offline
    Messages:
    488
    Likes Received:
    5,271
    There is a pretty high chance that NK missile would be intercepted before it hits Hawaii. Private companies can already land rockets on moving ships, so if they don't intercept the missile it would be an embarrassment to the nation. Hawaii's GDP is 61 billion USD and I doubt it would even take a few billion to develop a great interception system.

    It doesn't seem like NK has any individual motive to attack the United States, because they would probably be quickly destroyed. It would make more sense if they were actually a puppet state acting to defend the interests of a superpower like China or Russia.
     
  2. DarkKnight49x

    DarkKnight49x ⏦ ❀ The True Dark Knight ❀ ⏦

    Offline
    Messages:
    751
    Likes Received:
    2,021
    watch there be no war after all then we actually start a war with pigeons
     
  3. MeepLord27

    MeepLord27 Popular Meeper

    Offline
    Messages:
    1,039
    Likes Received:
    935
    We shouldn't go into another warzone. As a means of last resort we should give other countries money to deal with the problem. South Korea or other countries in the region have an incentive to not leave a massive power vacuum, the US is so far removed that once the immediate threat is squashed I have no faith they will stick around to do any effective rebuilding. The humanitarian consequences should be considered, who will take care of the North Korean peasants if we destabilize the country? We don't need more third world refugees coming too our country because we blew up all of the infrastructure in theirs.

    Ideally no countries should have nuclear weapons, but their is a marked difference between a rouge nation with a literal nut as a leader having nuclear weapons and established world powers having nuclear weapons.

    Donald Trump tweets mean things, Kim Jong Un executes people with anti aircraft guns and keeps child sex slaves at his various residences across North Korea. They are not comparable at all.
     
    KyloMeep, Bob4444444, cooey and 3 others like this.
  4. Skaros123

    Skaros123 Otaku Wooden Hoe

    Offline
    Messages:
    3,218
    Likes Received:
    7,287
    I doubt China would take North Korea's side if they attack. China only wants North Korea to remain in power because they block South Korea from bordering them. They do not capitalism encroaching on their borders. This is why China intervened with the Korean War, the United States was encroaching. Had it not been for China being so overprotective of their own borders, I don't think North Korea would be in existence.
    China has said that although they do not want any nukes being dropped in the region, they will not defend North Korea in the event they make an unprecedented attack on the US and its allies. That said, China's economy depends on the US. If China goes to war with the US, they would destroy themselves economically.
     
  5. MeepLord27

    MeepLord27 Popular Meeper

    Offline
    Messages:
    1,039
    Likes Received:
    935
    THEY.
    ARE.
    NOT.
    COMPARABLE.
     
  6. epick8

    epick8 The Meme Lord

    Offline
    Messages:
    1,017
    Likes Received:
    1,827
    1) Worst logic. " If North Korea can't then neither can anyone".
    2) if you think norea korea will willingly give up their nukes you're insane
    3) There won't be a war if past precedents stand.