Best Posts in Thread: President Trump

If you bought milk on the day he was hired, it's still good

Lol

 

I agree, all that time he spends golfing and not in the white house really does help us. I seriously want him away from his desk as much as possible.

We finally found some common ground.

 

This is a legitimate question so please don't think I am being sarcastic but I thought Trump's appeal was that he wasn't like every other politician that stretches the truth and tells white lies.

 

Reading relevant news and studies to formulate an opinion =/= googling your opinion

 

God damn, wtf is going on now. It's almost reminiscent of Nixon right before Watergate blew up.

 

You seem like you are literally a troll.

 

1) Weren't you the one talking about how it should be illegal to trash talk police/military etc.? Also, I don't see people trying to restrict free speech.
2) Most aren't, at least to my knowledge. It's more about stricter laws about obtaining guns and stuff, but I'm not an expert in that.

 

I would agree that the lie by itself is relatively asinine and unimportant. However, it highlights a concerning trend we've seen with Trump--ignoring the facts, and changing them to fit a narrative. Brushing off actual facts and historical research at-will is very dangerous--from the article, Trump essentially says he knows more than the tens of historians and Civil War-experts.

Given this, it's reasonable to extrapolate that Trump will have issues listening to experts who disagree with whatever preconceived notion he has, which becomes an issue when the administration needs to make policy regarding something that's not within the scope of his expertise. It's like an art major writing the curriculum for engineering courses.

TLR: While this is a little white lie in itself, it shows that Trump can't shut up about things he doesn't know, which is bad for policy.

 

Oh, like the 2nd Amendment?

 

So we can't call it a ban even though the President himself still calls it a Ban?

"First the Ninth Circuit rules against the ban & now it hits again on sanctuary cities-both ridiculous rulings. See you in the Supreme Court!"
-Donald J Trump

Also this idiotic President didn't even get the right court! The ruling wasn't made by the 9th circuit it was made by a San Francisco Federal Judge. What a joke.

 

"threw" is a past tense of to throw. 'through' is to be in the process of completion. So natsu is right.

 

Actually, using ice cores, they can tell pretty exactly the temperatures and stuff. Its actually really cool how they do it with a huge drill.

 

This guys a climate change denier.
Hes just dumb.

 

Assad might not be a good person, at all, but he is like most dictators. He didn't attempt to conquer the world and didn't create a huge world-wide crisis. He didn't cause the deaths of millions upon millions of people. I had a lot of relatives, some of which I got to know, that fought in World War Two, and others who spent years in concentration camps. I was actually talking to my family and a neighboring one about our relatives' experiences in concentration camps. I had talked to a woman a few years ago, who at nine, was constantly whipped for speaking her own language or some other "misdemeanor". She was drawn blood from till almost death, so that they could supply that blood to their troops. When they were let outside, she said that all the grass that grew on the field was gone within hours, eaten by the starving prisoners. And this happened across all of Europe. World War Two is a subject I feel very passionate about, as it had affected and tortured, destroyed, killed millions of people. Don't get me wrong, I don't like Assad, but he is no where near as bad as Hitler. If he was, then it wouldn't just be directly affecting a small portion of the Earth. This is a proxy war, similar to the many others held between the US and USSR/Russia, it's no where near as bad.

 

I know this is off topic but do you play Rome 1 or Medieval 2 Total War?

 

They are the same thing.............


Catholics are Christians.

 

Dude. Every time someone makes a point you can't counter, you just change the topic completely and go spout some more complete nonsense. Just stop.

 

Marriage is between people. Sexuality does not define whether a family can be held together.

Dude are you serious right now?

Can you provide proof on how gay marriage is detrimental to a child??

As long as the child receives love, care, and support they are okay. There are many many straight families that don't provide these necessities. Sexuality has nothing to do with how a child is raised, the acts of raising the child are the defining points.

Now I understand Deinens viewpoint on eradicating your backwards style of thinking.

 

@Blue_marlin98

Hit me up on discord. I have an honesty story for you that is probably innapropriate here, but it will inform you of where I'm coming from in my arguments. I completely understand your worldview and I understand where it comes from and I can tell you more about your worldview than you'd expect.

It wasn't my intention to hurt your feeling or belittle you, but to jar you into some reaction and drive you to look a bit further into your views.

 

Donald Trump's plan to ban Muslims from America just disappeared from his website

This is Trump calling for a total and complete shutdown (and temporary) of Muslims entering the United States.



Guiliani is admitting that Trump came to him for assistance on writing a "Muslim ban" that was legal.

These are just two of a few examples that the courts considered when making the decision that his executive order did indeed equate to a Muslim ban. When a person talks about doing something and then proceeds to follow through on doing something very similar to his rhetoric previously it's not a large leap of assumption to equate those things.

Which all in all is quite telling for your ideology because when you're down to arguing the technicalities of your ideology then you've already lost in a big way. But did you also know these executive orders are unlawful? Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on national origin?

Federal Protections Against National Origin Discrimination | CRT | Department of Justice

You can scream it's not a Muslim ban all you want but it's irrelevant because courts of the United States of America have ruled, for now, that it essentially equates to being one, if only because of our President is so incompetent and such a loud mouth buffoon he can't even keep his mouth shut long enough to not incriminate himself of his incompetent ignorance.

Did you see his health care plan? It'll raise the rates for the elderly up to 750%. If you disliked the mandated healthcare, you'll be glad to know that you'll be penalized still for not having health care by up to 30% on the next policy you purchase.

How about his budget proposal? Did you see the massive departmental cuts being made to funnel money to the wall that Mexico, of course, isn't going to pay for?

The 62 agencies and programs Trump wants to eliminate

Read this article and see what is being eliminated and what they do.